Obama made $5m in 2009 and tells us we've made enough?
By: J.P. Freire
Associate Commentary Editor
04/29/10 3:26 PM EDT
Obama says you’ve made enough money. Easy for him to say when his income last year looked like this: $5,500,000
In a stump speech in Quincy, Illinois, President Obama suggested that “I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.”
Obama made almost $5.5 million last year, most of which came from book royalties according to his tax return.
This comes on top of the other millions of dollars Obama received in previous years. The fact that Obama has been in the public spotlight as a politician has undoubtedly had an impact on the royalties of his two books as well. Go ahead and compare Obama’s 2009 income with other presidents here.
And let’s not forget that while Obama stepped up his charitable giving this year, he was noted to have given very little to charity:
What is surprising, given the recent controversy over Obama’s membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ, is how little the Obamas apparently gave to charity — well short of the biblical 10% tithe for all seven years. In two of the years, the Obamas gave far less than 1% of their income to charity; in three of the years, they gave around 1% of their income to charity. Only in the last two years have they given substantially more as their income skyrocketed — 4.7% in 2005 and 6.1% in 2006. (Of course, it is possible that the Obamas may have made gifts to other worthy causes that were not deductible for federal income tax purposes.)
So when the president lectures about who’s earned enough, let’s keep in mind what he himself did in practice.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/look-whos-talking-obamas-making-enough-money-too-92439904.html#ixzz0mZDfIial
Friday, April 30, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
Rules for Radicals
For those of you who’ve never read Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, but yet you’ve heard the media (Fox) speak about BO, SEIU, the Demorats, and the progressives using Alinsky’s tactics. Well let me help you out. Here are some excerpts from his book Rules for Radicals, read through them, and I guarantee that you’ve seen the left using these exact tactics. We can win this battle using Sun Tzu’s Tactics from The Art of War.
“It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle”—-Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu; Sūn Zǐ; (c. 6th century BC) was a Chinese General, military strategist, and author of The Art of War, an immensely influential ancient Chinese book on military strategy; also known as Sun Wu; Sūn Wǔ), and Chang Qing ; Cháng Qīng).
[This is Jim: I have put a couple of comments in brackets. I made some parts bold and/or italicized as they seemed particularly pronounced.]
Rules for Radicals
by Saul D Alinsky (book excerpt)
A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals
Tactics mean doing what you can with what you have. Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. In the world of give and take, tactics is the art of how to take and how to give. Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.
For an elementary illustration of tactics, take parts of your face as the point of reference; your eyes, your ears, and your nose. First the eyes; if you have organized a vast, mass-based people’s organization, you can parade it visibly before the enemy and openly show your power. Second the ears; if your organization is small in numbers, then…conceal the members in the dark but raise a din and clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more than it does. Third, the nose; if your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place.
[-1] Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have. [Hence, arrogant condescension.]
[-2] The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
[-3] The third rule is: Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
[-4] The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
[-5] The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.
[-6] The sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
[-7] The seventh rule is: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment…
[-8] The eighth rule: Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
[-9] The ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
[10] The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
[11] The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative…
[12] The twelfth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. you cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying “You’re right–we don’t know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us.”
[13] The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and “frozen.” By this I mean that in a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a constant, and somewhat legitimate, passing of the buck….
It should be borne in mind that the target is always trying to shift responsibility to get out of being the target…. [And the Dems are masters at this!]
One of the criteria in picking your target is the target’s vulnerability–where do you have the power to start? Furthermore, the target can always say, “Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?” When you “freeze the target,” you disregard these arguments and, for the moment, all others to blame.
Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all of the “others” come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.
The other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a PERSONIFICATION, not something general and abstract such as a community’s segregated practices or a major corporation or City Hall. It is not possible to develop the necessary hostility against, say, City Hall, which after all is a concrete, physical, inanimate structure, or against a corporation, which has no soul or identity, or a public school administration, which again is an inanimate system.
“It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle”—-Sun Tzu
Sun Tzu; Sūn Zǐ; (c. 6th century BC) was a Chinese General, military strategist, and author of The Art of War, an immensely influential ancient Chinese book on military strategy; also known as Sun Wu; Sūn Wǔ), and Chang Qing ; Cháng Qīng).
[This is Jim: I have put a couple of comments in brackets. I made some parts bold and/or italicized as they seemed particularly pronounced.]
Rules for Radicals
by Saul D Alinsky (book excerpt)
A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals
Tactics mean doing what you can with what you have. Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. In the world of give and take, tactics is the art of how to take and how to give. Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.
For an elementary illustration of tactics, take parts of your face as the point of reference; your eyes, your ears, and your nose. First the eyes; if you have organized a vast, mass-based people’s organization, you can parade it visibly before the enemy and openly show your power. Second the ears; if your organization is small in numbers, then…conceal the members in the dark but raise a din and clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more than it does. Third, the nose; if your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place.
[-1] Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have. [Hence, arrogant condescension.]
[-2] The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
[-3] The third rule is: Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
[-4] The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
[-5] The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.
[-6] The sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
[-7] The seventh rule is: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment…
[-8] The eighth rule: Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
[-9] The ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
[10] The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
[11] The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative…
[12] The twelfth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. you cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying “You’re right–we don’t know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us.”
[13] The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and “frozen.” By this I mean that in a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a constant, and somewhat legitimate, passing of the buck….
It should be borne in mind that the target is always trying to shift responsibility to get out of being the target…. [And the Dems are masters at this!]
One of the criteria in picking your target is the target’s vulnerability–where do you have the power to start? Furthermore, the target can always say, “Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?” When you “freeze the target,” you disregard these arguments and, for the moment, all others to blame.
Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all of the “others” come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.
The other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a PERSONIFICATION, not something general and abstract such as a community’s segregated practices or a major corporation or City Hall. It is not possible to develop the necessary hostility against, say, City Hall, which after all is a concrete, physical, inanimate structure, or against a corporation, which has no soul or identity, or a public school administration, which again is an inanimate system.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Thank God for President Obama
You think I'm kidding? Check out the bright side:
He destroyed the Clinton Political Machine - Driving a stake thru the Heart of Hillary's Presidential aspirations--something no Republican was ever able to do. Remember when a Hillary Presidency scared the daylights out of you!
He killed off the Kennedy Dynasty - No more Kennedys trolling Washington looking for booze and women wanting rides home. American women and freedom are safer tonight!
He is destroying the Democratic Party before our eyes!
Dennis Moore had never lost a race - quit
Evan Bayh had never lost a race - quit
Byron Dorgan - had never lost a race - quit
Harry Reid - bid for re-election doesn't look good
These are just a handful of the Democrats whose political careers Obama has destroyed! In December of 2008 the Democrats were on the rise. In the last two election cycles they had picked up 14 senate seats and 52 house seats. The press was touting the death of the Conservative Movement and the Republican Party. In one year Obama put a stop to all of this and will probably give the house, if not the senate back to the Republicans.
He has completely exposed liberals and progressives for what they are. Every generation seems to need to relearn the lesson on why they should never actually put liberals in charge.
He is bringing home the lesson very well!
Liberals tax, borrow and spend - check
Liberals won't bring themselves to protect America - check
Liberals want to take over the economy - check
Liberals think they know what is best for everyone - check
Liberals aren't happy till they are running YOUR life - check
He has brought more Americans back to conservatism than anyone since Reagan. In one year he rejuvenated the Conservative Movement and brought out to the streets millions of Freedom Loving Americans.
In all honesty one year ago I was more afraid than I had ever been in my life. Not of the economy, but of the direction our country was going. I thought Americans had forgotten what this country was all about. My neighbors, friends, strangers proved to me that my lack of confidence of the greatness and wisdom of the American people was flat out wrong. When the American People wake up, no smooth talking teleprompter reader can fool them!
So, Lets Recap 2009:
1. The American people inaugurate a president with a total of 142 days experience as a US Senator from the most politically corrupt state (city) in America whose governors have been ousted from office. The President's first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and make sure terrorist's civil rights are not violated. (Honest mistake?)
2. The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric Holder, whose law firm we later find out represents seventeen Gitmo Terrorists. (An honest mistake?)
3. The CIA Boss appointee, Leon Panetta, has absolutely no experience.
4. We got the second most corrupt American woman (Pelosi is #1) as Secretary of State; bought and paid for. (You can put lipstick on a pig, but it still stinks.)
5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who did not properly file his own taxes for 12 years. (He misspoke.)
6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges. (Another honest mistake?)
7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under charges. (Hmmm... )
8. A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical conduct. (Ok, maybe this person was just plain stupid.)
9. A Secretary HHS nominee (Daschle) who withdrew under charges of cheating on his taxes. (I'm running out of excuses for these idiots.)
10. Multiple appointments of former lobbyists after an absolute campaign statement that no lobbyists would be appointed. (Dear God, I am getting a headache.)
All this occurred just during the first three weeks. . . But who's counting?
America is being run by the modern-day Three Stooges; Barry, Nancy and Harry and they are still trying to define stimulus..."it's spending."
The congress passes the $800,000,000,000 (that's $800 billion) pork-loaded spending bill where the government gives you a smidgen of your tax dollars ($13 per week), making you feel so good about yourself [stimulated], that you want to run out to Wal-Mart and buy a new Chinese-made HDTV!
Here's the good news though - Obama took Air Force One to Denver to sign the stimulus package, wasting as much as 10,000 gallons of fuel OR 24 JOBS FOR ONE YEAR.
Obama went to the International Olympic Committee to have them choose Chicago for a host city, he failed.
Obama went to Copenhagen to lecture them on global warming, he failed
Obama went to New Jersey to promote the Democratic candidate for governor, he failed,
Obama went to Virginia to promote the Democratic candidate for governor, he failed.
Obama went to Massachusetts to promote the Democratic candidate for senator, he failed.
And finally, he is the 1st president to remain on vacation after a terrorist attack.
Anyone that supports this insanity can keep the change....
He destroyed the Clinton Political Machine - Driving a stake thru the Heart of Hillary's Presidential aspirations--something no Republican was ever able to do. Remember when a Hillary Presidency scared the daylights out of you!
He killed off the Kennedy Dynasty - No more Kennedys trolling Washington looking for booze and women wanting rides home. American women and freedom are safer tonight!
He is destroying the Democratic Party before our eyes!
Dennis Moore had never lost a race - quit
Evan Bayh had never lost a race - quit
Byron Dorgan - had never lost a race - quit
Harry Reid - bid for re-election doesn't look good
These are just a handful of the Democrats whose political careers Obama has destroyed! In December of 2008 the Democrats were on the rise. In the last two election cycles they had picked up 14 senate seats and 52 house seats. The press was touting the death of the Conservative Movement and the Republican Party. In one year Obama put a stop to all of this and will probably give the house, if not the senate back to the Republicans.
He has completely exposed liberals and progressives for what they are. Every generation seems to need to relearn the lesson on why they should never actually put liberals in charge.
He is bringing home the lesson very well!
Liberals tax, borrow and spend - check
Liberals won't bring themselves to protect America - check
Liberals want to take over the economy - check
Liberals think they know what is best for everyone - check
Liberals aren't happy till they are running YOUR life - check
He has brought more Americans back to conservatism than anyone since Reagan. In one year he rejuvenated the Conservative Movement and brought out to the streets millions of Freedom Loving Americans.
In all honesty one year ago I was more afraid than I had ever been in my life. Not of the economy, but of the direction our country was going. I thought Americans had forgotten what this country was all about. My neighbors, friends, strangers proved to me that my lack of confidence of the greatness and wisdom of the American people was flat out wrong. When the American People wake up, no smooth talking teleprompter reader can fool them!
So, Lets Recap 2009:
1. The American people inaugurate a president with a total of 142 days experience as a US Senator from the most politically corrupt state (city) in America whose governors have been ousted from office. The President's first official act is to order the close of Gitmo and make sure terrorist's civil rights are not violated. (Honest mistake?)
2. The U.S. Congress rushes to confirm a black Attorney General, Eric Holder, whose law firm we later find out represents seventeen Gitmo Terrorists. (An honest mistake?)
3. The CIA Boss appointee, Leon Panetta, has absolutely no experience.
4. We got the second most corrupt American woman (Pelosi is #1) as Secretary of State; bought and paid for. (You can put lipstick on a pig, but it still stinks.)
5. We got a Tax Cheat for Treasury Secretary who did not properly file his own taxes for 12 years. (He misspoke.)
6. A Commerce Secretary nominee who withdrew due to corruption charges. (Another honest mistake?)
7. A Tax cheat nominee for Chief Performance Officer who withdrew under charges. (Hmmm... )
8. A Labor Secretary nominee who withdrew under charges of unethical conduct. (Ok, maybe this person was just plain stupid.)
9. A Secretary HHS nominee (Daschle) who withdrew under charges of cheating on his taxes. (I'm running out of excuses for these idiots.)
10. Multiple appointments of former lobbyists after an absolute campaign statement that no lobbyists would be appointed. (Dear God, I am getting a headache.)
All this occurred just during the first three weeks. . . But who's counting?
America is being run by the modern-day Three Stooges; Barry, Nancy and Harry and they are still trying to define stimulus..."it's spending."
The congress passes the $800,000,000,000 (that's $800 billion) pork-loaded spending bill where the government gives you a smidgen of your tax dollars ($13 per week), making you feel so good about yourself [stimulated], that you want to run out to Wal-Mart and buy a new Chinese-made HDTV!
Here's the good news though - Obama took Air Force One to Denver to sign the stimulus package, wasting as much as 10,000 gallons of fuel OR 24 JOBS FOR ONE YEAR.
Obama went to the International Olympic Committee to have them choose Chicago for a host city, he failed.
Obama went to Copenhagen to lecture them on global warming, he failed
Obama went to New Jersey to promote the Democratic candidate for governor, he failed,
Obama went to Virginia to promote the Democratic candidate for governor, he failed.
Obama went to Massachusetts to promote the Democratic candidate for senator, he failed.
And finally, he is the 1st president to remain on vacation after a terrorist attack.
Anyone that supports this insanity can keep the change....
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Alrighty Then....
Here it is, folks, the response we've all waited for from Dian(n)e. Notice how she doesn't get to her commercial for quite a while, and once again notice how far apart the paragraphs are:
Dear Mr. Locke:
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about federal expenditures. I appreciate the time you took to write about this important issue, and I apologize for the delay in my response.
I believe that new government programs should be considered with their impact on the federal deficit in mind. I share your serious concern about our nation's increasing debt and the financial burden it will place on future generations. Our national debt is now over $12 trillion, which translates to roughly $40,000 owed by every American citizen.
Last year, a number of significant factors contributed to our federal budget deficit reaching a record $1.4 trillion. Legislation was enacted to stabilize financial markets, assist homeowners, and create jobs in an effort to stem the economic downturn. Due in part to the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program and $787 billion economic stimulus bill, the economy is beginning to show signs of recovery. However, additional measures may be necessary to create jobs and assist the unemployed, especially while the unemployment rate in California is over 12 percent.
As the economy begins to recover, Members of Congress must work together to improve our budgetary outlook by enacting more fiscally responsible policies. I am pleased that President Obama has signed an executive order to establish a bipartisan commission, the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, to recommend policies for reducing deficits and ensuring the long-term solvency of entitlement programs. Congress must act to reduce budget deficits, while strengthening entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security going forward. Please know that I understand how strongly many Californians feel about the growth of federal expenditures, and I assure you that I am working in the Senate to reduce the federal deficit.
Again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.
Sincerely yours,
Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the Nation are available at my website http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list at http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ENewsletterSignup.Signup.
Dear Mr. Locke:
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about federal expenditures. I appreciate the time you took to write about this important issue, and I apologize for the delay in my response.
I believe that new government programs should be considered with their impact on the federal deficit in mind. I share your serious concern about our nation's increasing debt and the financial burden it will place on future generations. Our national debt is now over $12 trillion, which translates to roughly $40,000 owed by every American citizen.
Last year, a number of significant factors contributed to our federal budget deficit reaching a record $1.4 trillion. Legislation was enacted to stabilize financial markets, assist homeowners, and create jobs in an effort to stem the economic downturn. Due in part to the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program and $787 billion economic stimulus bill, the economy is beginning to show signs of recovery. However, additional measures may be necessary to create jobs and assist the unemployed, especially while the unemployment rate in California is over 12 percent.
As the economy begins to recover, Members of Congress must work together to improve our budgetary outlook by enacting more fiscally responsible policies. I am pleased that President Obama has signed an executive order to establish a bipartisan commission, the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, to recommend policies for reducing deficits and ensuring the long-term solvency of entitlement programs. Congress must act to reduce budget deficits, while strengthening entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security going forward. Please know that I understand how strongly many Californians feel about the growth of federal expenditures, and I assure you that I am working in the Senate to reduce the federal deficit.
Again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.
Sincerely yours,
Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the Nation are available at my website http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list at http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ENewsletterSignup.Signup.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
The Day Before
Well, it's the day before a big vote on health care reform. Or is it health insurance reform? Or is it health care delivery system reform? Or is it health welfare entitlement time for millions of helpless souls, many with big screens, Mini-Coopers, Harleys, out-of-wedlock children, unaffordable children, the owner of my neighbor's house who hasn't made a mortgage payment in a year but drives a late model BMW, or most of the people on the Sunset Strip in Hollywood on a Friday night?
One of my relatives had two children out of wedlock by the time she was 20. She works hard and always has -- but says she can't afford health insurance. But she had two children out of wedlock before age 20. (HER age was 20, not the kids.) Of course she can't afford insurance if the kids want to be fed and housed. But she's a victim. (Did you recognize a little sarcasm there? Actually, I'M the victim -- and if you pay taxes YOU'RE the victim.)
Health care is available for every citizen and non-citizen. Those without insurance or mega cash might have to wait several hours before treatment, but they'll get it.
Our Emergency Rooms have turned into clinics. I encourage all to visit ERs at any time of the day or night and check out the waiting room. I will personally guarantee there will be more chronic illness (sometimes in an acute phase, but chronic nonetheless), than there will be actual emergent cases. Especially, I would urge you to check out a children's hospital ER. Report back to me, will ya?!?
Well, this morning I decided it was time to write Brad Sherman, my Congressional Representative and urge him to vote NO on this outlandish legislation which is not affordable to us, our children, our employers, and will allow thousands of small businesses to fail.
Here is a copy of my note to Brad, and please stay tuned for a response from Brad which will come in, oh.. about a month or so. (They must have extremely slow computers over there!)
__________________________________________
Congressman,
Please vote NO on the health reform bill before Congress. It's obvious the public does not want what is proposed -- blatantly obvious. Even CBS and the NYT aren't disagreeing.
First try insurance competition. What sense does it make that we can buy other insurance but not health insurance across state lines? To protect the COMPANIES? That's ludicrous. Competition would help in establishing standardization of prices and fees; go a long way towards keeping more accurate and condensed records; and eliminate the 'pre-existing' debacle but in a 'fair' manor. (I know how you like the word "fair.")
Second, tort reform. Even though most of you guys are lawyers THAT industry is the one that's out of control. Make the losers of lawsuits pay all legal expenses and watch frivolous lawsuits disappear overnight. OVERNIGHT.
Please send me a direct response with rebuttals as to why those 2 ideas in your opinion won't work and avoid sending me the letter (actually commercial) which is the response for every letter sent no matter what the issue.
Thanks, Brad.
Jim Locke
One of my relatives had two children out of wedlock by the time she was 20. She works hard and always has -- but says she can't afford health insurance. But she had two children out of wedlock before age 20. (HER age was 20, not the kids.) Of course she can't afford insurance if the kids want to be fed and housed. But she's a victim. (Did you recognize a little sarcasm there? Actually, I'M the victim -- and if you pay taxes YOU'RE the victim.)
Health care is available for every citizen and non-citizen. Those without insurance or mega cash might have to wait several hours before treatment, but they'll get it.
Our Emergency Rooms have turned into clinics. I encourage all to visit ERs at any time of the day or night and check out the waiting room. I will personally guarantee there will be more chronic illness (sometimes in an acute phase, but chronic nonetheless), than there will be actual emergent cases. Especially, I would urge you to check out a children's hospital ER. Report back to me, will ya?!?
Well, this morning I decided it was time to write Brad Sherman, my Congressional Representative and urge him to vote NO on this outlandish legislation which is not affordable to us, our children, our employers, and will allow thousands of small businesses to fail.
Here is a copy of my note to Brad, and please stay tuned for a response from Brad which will come in, oh.. about a month or so. (They must have extremely slow computers over there!)
__________________________________________
Congressman,
Please vote NO on the health reform bill before Congress. It's obvious the public does not want what is proposed -- blatantly obvious. Even CBS and the NYT aren't disagreeing.
First try insurance competition. What sense does it make that we can buy other insurance but not health insurance across state lines? To protect the COMPANIES? That's ludicrous. Competition would help in establishing standardization of prices and fees; go a long way towards keeping more accurate and condensed records; and eliminate the 'pre-existing' debacle but in a 'fair' manor. (I know how you like the word "fair.")
Second, tort reform. Even though most of you guys are lawyers THAT industry is the one that's out of control. Make the losers of lawsuits pay all legal expenses and watch frivolous lawsuits disappear overnight. OVERNIGHT.
Please send me a direct response with rebuttals as to why those 2 ideas in your opinion won't work and avoid sending me the letter (actually commercial) which is the response for every letter sent no matter what the issue.
Thanks, Brad.
Jim Locke
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Another Stimulating and Personalized Response from Another Silly Politician
Yes, folks, here it is. A PERSONALIZED email to me from Ms. Boxer herself. Oops, I mean Madam Boxer... no, wait... Mrs. Boxer... uhhhhh... let's see... mmmmmm... oh, I forget what she wishes to be called, something she worked for... something she earned. (Well, we know it's not R E S P E C T -- with apologies to Aretha -- so it's between Mrs, and Ms... Ms=not a Mrs, and not a Miss... so I guess it means "near-miss?" Yeah, that's it! She's a Near-Miss.
Anyway, here is her personalized response to my note to her on February 21. Just curious, Bar, but why does it take 3 weeks to get an electronic response to an electronic message that you'll never see?
And call me Andy Looney, but why do these politicians put 5 or 6 line breaks between paragraphs? Is wasting things just in their nature???
Brace yourselves, folks.. you're about to enter the Twilight Zone......
=============================
From:
"senator@boxer.senate.gov"
Add sender to Contacts
To:
jimlocke@sbcglobal.net
Dear Mr. Locke:
Thank you for taking the time to send information to my office. One of the most important aspects of my job is keeping informed about the views of my constituents, and I welcome your comments so that I may continue to represent California to the best of my ability. Should I have the opportunity to consider legislation on this issue, I will keep your views in mind.
For additional information about my activities in the U.S. Senate, please visit my website, http://boxer.senate.gov. From this site, you can access statements and press releases that I have issued about current events and pending legislation, request copies of legislation and government reports, and receive detailed information about the many services that I am privileged to provide for my constituents. You may also wish to visit http://thomas.loc.gov to track current and past legislation.
Again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with me. I appreciate hearing from you.
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
Please do not respond to this message. If you would like to comment on legislation, please visit my website and use the correspondence form at https://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm
===================================
You'll see the last thing she tells me is to not respond to this message. Please note that even though SHE followed those instructions they did NOT originate with me -- she said it first!
I will do everything I can to see this bitch voted out... (did I say that?!??!)
Anyway, here is her personalized response to my note to her on February 21. Just curious, Bar, but why does it take 3 weeks to get an electronic response to an electronic message that you'll never see?
And call me Andy Looney, but why do these politicians put 5 or 6 line breaks between paragraphs? Is wasting things just in their nature???
Brace yourselves, folks.. you're about to enter the Twilight Zone......
=============================
From:
"senator@boxer.senate.gov"
Add sender to Contacts
To:
jimlocke@sbcglobal.net
Dear Mr. Locke:
Thank you for taking the time to send information to my office. One of the most important aspects of my job is keeping informed about the views of my constituents, and I welcome your comments so that I may continue to represent California to the best of my ability. Should I have the opportunity to consider legislation on this issue, I will keep your views in mind.
For additional information about my activities in the U.S. Senate, please visit my website, http://boxer.senate.gov. From this site, you can access statements and press releases that I have issued about current events and pending legislation, request copies of legislation and government reports, and receive detailed information about the many services that I am privileged to provide for my constituents. You may also wish to visit http://thomas.loc.gov to track current and past legislation.
Again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with me. I appreciate hearing from you.
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
Please do not respond to this message. If you would like to comment on legislation, please visit my website and use the correspondence form at https://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm
===================================
You'll see the last thing she tells me is to not respond to this message. Please note that even though SHE followed those instructions they did NOT originate with me -- she said it first!
I will do everything I can to see this bitch voted out... (did I say that?!??!)
Thursday, March 4, 2010
New, Concise, Informative, and PERSONALIZED Response From BRAD SHERMAN, My Congressman!
A few weeks ago... yes.. WEEKS... I wrote my Congressional Representative specifically asking why we don't try TORT reform, opening trade between health insurers so they may sell across state lines, and a couple of other suggestions to address CAUSES of the so-called health "care" or "insurance" or "reform" crisis -- (even they don't know what to call it) -- rather than deal with CONSEQUENCES. I don't know, it just seems smart to me to deal with the stuff that made the problems rather than the results of those problems, knowudimsayin.
I am so pleased today. I received my personalized response from my Congressional Representative, The Hon. Brad Sherman. After reading this I feel much better that he is in Washington to represent me AND you in these trying times. Here is what he sent me in an email today:
________________________________________________
Dear Mr. Locke:
Thank you very much for contacting me with your views about health care and tort reform. I appreciate your taking the time to share your concerns with me.
Hearing from you is very important to me because it provides me with insight into your thoughts and concerns on the major issues facing Congress today. I look forward to your continued input and will keep your concerns in mind as legislation on these issues is considered on the House floor or in any of my committees.
Only part of my job is voting in Washington. Another important part of my job is helping resolve problems that constituents are experiencing with federal agencies. If you are interested in any of these services, please contact my district office at (818) 501-9200 or visit my website at http://BradSherman.house.gov.
You can also follow me on Twitter by visiting Twitter.com/BradSherman, or become my fan on Facebook. My official government Facebook page is registered as "Congressman Brad Sherman."
Again, thank you very much for contacting me and sharing your views. I hope to hear from you further in the future.
Sincerely,
Brad Sherman
Member of Congress
Please note that Brad Sherman respects your privacy. If you sign up for Congressman Sherman's email updates or participate in a questionnaire, your email information will never be sold, traded or rented to any outside company. If you wish to contact me further, I welcome your correspondence. However, please do not reply to this message. Instead, please visit my website, http://bradsherman.house.gov/sherman/contact, and e-mail me through the webform provided. Thank you very much for contacting me.
_________________________________________________
Notice something, folks, please... he typed SINCERELY, Brad Sherman blah, blah, blah. He actually meant it!
I wonder if I contributed to his mandatory $4-5,000 per day/every day he's in office/ including week-ends and holidays fund raising minimum we might get some personalized embellishment. Maybe he could even mention my name in the middle of the email!
I am so pleased today. I received my personalized response from my Congressional Representative, The Hon. Brad Sherman. After reading this I feel much better that he is in Washington to represent me AND you in these trying times. Here is what he sent me in an email today:
________________________________________________
Dear Mr. Locke:
Thank you very much for contacting me with your views about health care and tort reform. I appreciate your taking the time to share your concerns with me.
Hearing from you is very important to me because it provides me with insight into your thoughts and concerns on the major issues facing Congress today. I look forward to your continued input and will keep your concerns in mind as legislation on these issues is considered on the House floor or in any of my committees.
Only part of my job is voting in Washington. Another important part of my job is helping resolve problems that constituents are experiencing with federal agencies. If you are interested in any of these services, please contact my district office at (818) 501-9200 or visit my website at http://BradSherman.house.gov.
You can also follow me on Twitter by visiting Twitter.com/BradSherman, or become my fan on Facebook. My official government Facebook page is registered as "Congressman Brad Sherman."
Again, thank you very much for contacting me and sharing your views. I hope to hear from you further in the future.
Sincerely,
Brad Sherman
Member of Congress
Please note that Brad Sherman respects your privacy. If you sign up for Congressman Sherman's email updates or participate in a questionnaire, your email information will never be sold, traded or rented to any outside company. If you wish to contact me further, I welcome your correspondence. However, please do not reply to this message. Instead, please visit my website, http://bradsherman.house.gov/sherman/contact, and e-mail me through the webform provided. Thank you very much for contacting me.
_________________________________________________
Notice something, folks, please... he typed SINCERELY, Brad Sherman blah, blah, blah. He actually meant it!
I wonder if I contributed to his mandatory $4-5,000 per day/every day he's in office/ including week-ends and holidays fund raising minimum we might get some personalized embellishment. Maybe he could even mention my name in the middle of the email!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)