There was a story in the Spiegel Online International about President Obama's trip to Asia and the rewards he reaped for us. This is an independent German media news outlet, beholding to no one political faction or stated ideology.
The lead on the US Foreign Policy page reads, Obama's Nice Guy Act Gets Him Nowhere on the World Stage.Other stories are: on the Opinion page, 'Obama Has Failed the World on Climate Change; in The World from Berlin section: 'Obama's Soft Approach on China Won't Succeed'; Reluctant Partners: Global Crisis Makes US More Dependent on China than Ever.
Let's just suppose that those articles were published by say, the New York Times, or on MSNBC, or even in the Wall Street Journal. Would American politicians have the temerity to take a stand, to be..... a .... rogue? Gosh, who is in that role now? (Nice segue, huh?)
Sarah Palin calls herself a rogue. Rogue is defined as a vagrant, tramp, a worthless person, (now we're getting to the good stuff) a mischievous person, or a scamp. It's also a horse inclined to shirk or misbehave and I think that's just what folks have in mind when they call her a rogue. She doesn't answer questions put to her like a politician -- she actually gives an answer. She doesn't hide and to other politicians that's frightening.
The left is afraid of her and it's hilarious! Even though Obama's rhetoric was about change, he did not even posture for a second once he took office. It has been nothing but literally a sham to see the corruption in his administration. Stupid, preposterous ideas such as: spending our way to prosperity and printing money to do that; an idea like paying for health care in part by eliminating fraud in Medicare. [Hey, Barry! What's to stop you from battling that fraud today?!?]
Can you imagine the spin and positions the left would have to come up with if Sarah Palin and Ron Paul got together? Talk about rogues.....
No comments:
Post a Comment